Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse est composée de cinq articles écrits durant la période de stage des chercheurs à l'Université McGill. Sur la base de M.Sc. Ces documents font des progrès vers la com- préhension de notre univers tel qu'il ressort de la théorie des cordes et sur les implications de la physique des hautes énergies pour la cosmologie. La thèse est divisée en 3 parties: (1) théorie des cordes, (2) cosmologie des cordes et (3) cosmologie. La partie (1) étudie une classe particulière d'arrière-plans dans la théorie des cordes et étudie la rupture de la supersymétrie dans ces milieux. Avec cet esprit, une partie (2) étudie la cosmologie dans ces configurations, travaillant directement dans la description en quatre dimensions. En- fin, la partie (3) s'écarte des (1) et (2) et se concentre plutôt sur les effets de la théorie des champs quantiques dans l'espace incurvé. Les implications de la stochasticité dans les équations différentielles couplées, décrivant les perturbations cosmologiques UV et IR, sont étudiées et des corrections aux observables cosmologiques sont trouvées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".