MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903110557 · doi:10.4000/books.pupvd.4856

La tuile peinte de Tautavel et la permanence d’un art schématique dans les Pyrénées-Orientales

2012· book-chapter· fr· W2903110557 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Abélanet

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le déménagement de l’actuel dépôt archéologique départemental vers un immeuble plus approprié de la zone Saint Charles, à Perpignan, nous a remis sous les yeux une tuile canal de toit, ornée d’un intéressant motif schématique peint au lait de chaux, que nous avions recueillie sur un tas de gravats et de déblais de maçonnerie, à l’époque déjà lointaine où nous étions conservateur en titre du musée de préhistoire de Tautavel (ill. 1). Cette humble peinture sur tuile valait la peine d’une étude...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Perpignan eBooksSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207