MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903159634 · doi:10.1130/abs/2018am-321322

ASSESSMENT OF THE IDENTITY AND BIODEGRADATION POTENTIAL OF HYDROCARBONS IN AN OIL SANDS PIT LAKE

2018· article· en· W2903159634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohamed Elwaraky, Gregory F. Slater, Robert K. Nelson, Christopher M. Reddy, Lesley A. Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTailingsOil sandsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryLand reclamationWater columnBiodegradationMethaneExtraction (chemistry)PetroleumFractionationWaste managementMining engineeringChemistryGeologyAsphaltEcologyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efforts are underway to develop effective methods to manage tailings and reclaim the land impacted by the mining and extraction of bitumen from the Alberta oil sands. Syncrude Canada Ltd. has undertaken the first full scale demonstration of water-capped Fluid Fine Tailings (FFT) via the development of Base Mine Lake (BML), an oil sands pit lake commissioned in 2012. A key component of this reclamation technology is the maintenance of an oxic water column which is required to support ecosystem functioning within the lake and provides the most effective conditions for the biodegradation of any toxic organics. However, the oxidation of dissolved methane released from the underlying tailings can reduce dissolved oxygen levels in the water column and impede EPL function. Methane is produced primarily via fermentation of organic residues within the tailings. Understanding the character, abundance, and variability of these organics will enable assessment of methane generation potential from the tailings and inform future management decisions. In this study, fluid fine tailings (FFT) samples were collected from 2 depths at 3 locations, and two time points from BML. Gravimetric analysis of total lipid extracts (TLEs) indicated that the total solvent extractable material was present at 25-42 mg/g. After fractionation on silica gel it was found that the TLE was dominated by the polar fraction (30- 52 %) while the saturates and aromatics ranged between 21-43 % each. Subsequently, these fractions were analyzed using multidimensional gas chromatography (GC-GC) in order to resolve the individual compound families that could have the greatest role in methane generation. GCGC based analysis of the TLEs showed that the primary group of compounds present are well resolved groups of C1-C5alkylated aromatics, branched and cyclic branched alkanes in addition to steranes and hopanes. These compounds were present in all of the samples, however the abundance of the alkylated aromatics and alkanes compared to the internal standard showed a variability spatially and temporally while the steranes and hopanes were invariant. Ongoing research will further assess the distribution patterns and variability of these compounds in order to determine their biodegradation potential and role in methane generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207