MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La monarchie française et l’éducation des filles (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles)

2018· article· fr· W2903193480 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dominique Picco

Bibliographic record

VenueEncounters in Theory and History of Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans la France moderne, l’éducation des enfants, garçons et filles, ne fait pas partie des champs traditionnels d’intervention de l’État monarchique. Ses ingérences sont rares et se limitent à des déclarations de principe, non suivi d’engagements administratifs et encore moins financiers. Ainsi en 1698 une déclaration de Louis XIV, reprise quasiment mots pour mots en 1724 par Louis XV, affirme la nécessité de fonder une école par paroisse et de rendre la scolarité obligatoire jusqu'à quatorze ans. La monarchie française d’Ancien Régime n’a donc jamais eu de véritable politique scolaire, même si elle a pu, occasionnellement, initier ou soutenir la création d’établissements, en particulier au XVIIIe siècle, des écoles spécialisées ‑Ponts et Chaussées en 1747 et Génie de Mézières l’année suivante, des écoles militaires à partir de 1751 ou des écoles vétérinaires à partir de 1762. Tous réservés aux garçons, ces espaces participent alors de la construction de la masculinité des jeunes générations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEncounters in Theory and History of EducationSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207