MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903208659 · doi:10.4000/dms.2680

About "Building sense of community at a distance"

2018· article· en· W2903208659 on OpenAlexaff
Terry Anderson

Bibliographic record

VenueDistances et médiations des savoirs · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense (electronics)Architectural engineeringSociologyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1) from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.1/rovai.pdf. Many of us had been arguing since the turn of the last century that there was growing evidence that “community” as both an assemblance of individuals and a distinct social entity, was not restricted to face-to-face interactions. Nearly two decades later, this seems to be an obvious fact given the proliferation of o...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDistances et médiations des savoirsSame topicCommunity Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207