MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903216893 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/41/1352

Pore-Network Reconstruction and Simulation of the Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer

2018· article· en· W2903216893 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammadamin Sadeghi, Jake E. Barralet, Jeff T. Gostick

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Layer (electronics)CatalysisComputer sciencePorosityCombustionMaterials scienceProcess engineeringNanotechnologyDistributed computingEngineeringChemistryPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuel cell technology is widely considered as a promising green alternative to the current internal combustion engines. Nevertheless, they are still expensive and therefore not economically viable for the majority. Among others, platinum underutilization in the catalyst layer is known problem that if tackled leads to a significant price reduction. The difficulty of this task stems from the very small size of the catalyst layer which makes it extremely difficult to probe experimentally. Consequently, modeling has been proven useful to give insights about the influencing factors in the catalyst layer and how they affect the overall performance of the fuel cell. Recently, pore-scale modeling has been employed to better understand transport phenomena at microscopic level. Nevertheless, because of the exponential computing requirements, most studies had to limit their scope either in domain size or resolution, which has two direct consequences: (a) the results may not be representative, and (b) they are not truly predictive. We propose a pore-scale model for the catalyst layer in the nanometer scale. Resolving the catalyst layer at this scale is unprecedented to the best of our knowledge. The model is based on pore-networks, i.e. mapping the porous structure onto an intricate network of pores connected through arbitrary throats. The underlying assumption in pore network models is that intensive properties are constant throughout each pore. Given the extremely small scale of pores in the catalyst layer, i.e. ~100 um, this assumption is reasonable. While pore network models inevitably introduce a small error, they reduce the computing requirement by 4 orders of magnitude or more. This feature allows for studying much larger domains with the same computing power. First, we digitally reconstruct the microstructure of the catalyst layer based on a process-based technique introduced by [1]. The reconstructed geometry is in the form of a 3d image and consists of 4 distinct phases: carbon support, platinum, nafion, and void. Using a network extraction algorithm [2], the equivalent networks corresponding to the void and carbon phases are extracted. We propose a simple algorithm to couple the two extracted networks with the remainder of the original 3d image, which now only consists of nafion and platinum. Finally, the diffusive transport of oxygen coupled with conductive transport of protons and electrons with the electrochemistry at the interface of nafion and platinum is solved through an iterative scheme. The results are reported in terms of effective properties and polarization curves. The effect of microstructural features such as nafion content and platinum loading on such properties are studied. All the geometric reconstructions and transport simulations were done with the open-source code OpenPNM [3]. The present study is a major step towards better understanding the multiphysics involved in the catalyst layer at true pore scale. The pore network methodology used in this study was key to significantly reducing the computing requirements that otherwise have hindered studying the catalyst layer at higher resolutions. We hope that this study will become a cornerstone for many future studies. References [1] Siddique, N. A., and Fuqiang Liu. Electrochimica Acta 55.19 (2010): 5357-5366. [2] Gostick, Jeff T. Physical Review E 96.2 (2017): 023307. [3] Gostick, Jeff, et al. Computing in Science & Engineering 18.4 (2016): 60-74. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207