Photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of silver and iron doped titania nanoparticles in solution and polyaspartic coatings
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Visible region active photocatalytic coatings are of interest for antimicrobial activity in low light applications or those employing LED lights with limited UV content. This work examined Ag and Fe doped titania nanoparticles (nTiO 2 ) with varying dopant ranges in polyaspartic polymer coatings for potential light and dark activity. First, the Ag and Fe doped nTiO 2 were synthesized by sol–gel chemistry with varying dopant concentrations, then characterized with respect to their size and aggregate size distribution, crystallinity, and surface and band gap features. The photocatalytic activity was then tested with methylene blue under both AM 1.5 G and visible light. From both sample sets (Ag and Fe doped nTiO 2 ), the best photo catalytically active sample materials were chosen for antibacterial tests with gram-negative Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) and gram-positive Bacillus subtilis ( B. subtilis ) in (a) solution and (b) polyaspartic nanocomposites under UV and visible irradiation. The results showed that Ag doped nTiO 2 samples delivered the best and excellent antibacterial action, even in the dark, attributed to both an enhanced band gap and surface area, as well as a combination of photocatalytic activity and Ag being present at the nanoparticle’s surface. No leaching of Ag at room temperature was observed from the nTiO 2 structure, giving potential for next generation coatings that are both light and dark active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it