MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CACHEXIO: Evaluation of body composition changes and immunotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer.

2018· article· en· W2903268770 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Roeland, Areej El‐Jawahri, Nora Horick, Sandahl H. Nelson, Andrea Gallivan, Ryan David Nipp, Yael Cohen-Arazi, Sarah Friedman, Chris Sera, Joseph Ma, Vickie E. Baracos, Sandip Pravin Patel, Hardeep Phull

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsImmunotherapyLung cancerIncidence (geometry)Adipose tissueAdverse effectChemotherapyCancerGastroenterologyProgressive disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

209 Background: Given body composition predicts toxicity for patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, we explored changes in body composition and biomarkers as predictors of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and health care utilization. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study of patients with metastatic solid tumor receiving immunotherapy (07/2014-10/2017). Eligible patients had a computed tomography (CT) scan prior to first-line immunotherapy with at least two additional CT scans at three, six or nine months after immunotherapy initiation. We analyzed body composition using cross-sectional CT scans at the third lumbar vertebra. We utilized mixed effect linear regression models to assess longitudinal changes in body composition (weight, skeletal muscle, total adipose). We examined associations of baseline body composition and biomarkers (albumin, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)) with the incidence of irAEs and healthcare utilization (hospitalizations/ED visits) using logistic regression. Results: Of 140 patients treated with immunotherapy, 61 met inclusion criteria. The majority (80%) received prior chemotherapy and the most common malignancies included lung (26%), head and neck (20%), and melanoma (20%). We found that one-third (n=19) experienced an irAE and colitis (53%) was the most common irAE. Patients experienced substantial weight loss over time (B= -1.88, p<0.001) with a decrease both in skeletal muscle (B= -3.08, p=0.001) and total adipose tissue (B =-50.44, p<0.001). We found greater skeletal muscle at baseline was associated with lower risk of health care utilization (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.965-0.998, p=0.03). We observed no association with biomarkers and/or body composition variables with irAEs or health care utilization. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic cancer receiving immunotherapy lose weight including skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Aside from higher baseline skeletal muscle predicting less health care utilization, we did not observe any other associations between body composition changes and irAEs or health care utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.517
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207