MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903269909 · doi:10.23919/eumc.2018.8541411

High Dynamic Range Low Power Drive Quadrature Millimeter-Wave Demodulator

2018· article· en· W2903269909 on OpenAlexaff
B. Zouggari, D. Hammou, C. Hannachi, Serioja Ovidiu Tatu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemodulationDirect-conversion receiverBasebandElectronic engineeringDynamic rangeLocal oscillatorDetectorElectrical engineeringBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceEngineeringPhysicsRadio frequencyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel demodulator implemented using a broadband six-port circuit and power detectors. Every single detector uses a pair of parallel Schottky diodes and a 90° hybrid coupler to improve the input match. The V-band demodulation results of the proposed six-port interferometric receiver are presented in a wide range of the local oscillator (LO) power. The detected baseband I/Q measurements results are quasi-linear over the considered LO power from 0 to - 40 dB. Moreover, the high-power drive is not required as in the case of conventional diode mixers. Real time Error Vector Magnitude (EVM) measurements of pseudorandom QPSK sequences are performed using a Vector Signal Analyzer. The results are around 5% over a LO power range of 35 dB. This performance demonstrates the capability of the quadrature interferometric mixer in direct demodulation using low LO power. The proposed circuit is well suited for millimeter-wave wireless communication systems and it can replace conventional mixers in efficient and low-cost homodyne receivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207