MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903272138 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v51i3.1945

Stability and compatibility of morphine with bupivacaine

2018· article· en· W2903272138 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Elliot Shiffman, Scott E. Walker, Tae Gyoon Yoon, Millie Yeung

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorphineBupivacaineExpiration dateChemistryMorphine sulfateChromatographySodiumAnesthesiaMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The stability and compatibility of 0.05 mg/ml morphine sulphate plus 1.0 mg/ml bupivacaine hydrochloride diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride was tested at 4°C and 23°C. Over a 28-day study period, in addition to visual inspection and pH, the concentrations of morphine and bupivacaine in the mixtures were determined by a stability-indicating liquid chromatographic method on days 0, I, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 19, 21, and 28. Within and between days analytical error, determined on replicate sample analysis, averaged less than 5%for both drugs. Morphine and bupivacaine were physically compatible and retained greater than 90% of the initial concentration of both morphine and bupivacaine for 28 days when stored at either 4°C or 23°C. The pH in these compatible solutions changed by less than 0.5 of a pH unit over the study period. In summary, we recommend a 28-day expiration date for the combination of morphine, 0.05 mg/ml and bupivacaine, 1 mg/ml. However, expiry dates at any given institution should be established after giving consideration to the contamination rate within that institution’s own IV additive program.  RESUME  La stabilite et la compatibilite du sulfate de morphine (0,5 mg/mL) et du chlorhydrate de bupivacaine (1,0 mg/ml) dilues dans du chlorure de sodium a 0,9 % ont ete testees a des temperatures de 4 °C et 23 °C, sur une periode de 28 jours. Outre les inspections visuelles et a la verification du pH, on a determine la concentration des solutions en morphine et en bupivacaine, au moyen d'une epreuve de stabilite par chromatographie liquide, aux jours 0, 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 19, 21 et 28. La marge d'erreur analytique pour une meme journee ou entre deux journees, determinee par une analyse d'echantillon repete, etait inferieure a 5 % en moyenne pour les deux medicaments. La morphine et la bupivacaine se sont revelees physiquement compatibles et ont conserve plus de 90 % de leurs concentrations initiales de morphine et de bupivacaine durant 28 jours, entreposees a des temperatures soit de 4 °C, soit de 23 °C. Le pH de ces solutions compatibles a varie de moins de 0,5 unite pH au cours de la periode d'etude. En resume, une duree de conservation maximale de 28 jours est recommandee pour les melanges de morphine (0,5 mg/ml) et de bupivacaine (1 mg/ml). Cependant, chaque etablissement devra tenir compte du taux de contamination relatif a son programme d'additifs aux solutes dans la determination des durees de conservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital PharmacySame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207