MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903285415 · doi:10.5539/mas.v12n12p185

Comprehensive Overview of Security and Privacy of Data Transfer in Wireless ad Hock Network

2018· article· en· W2903285415 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Faten Hamad, Hussam N. Fakhouri, Osama Rababah

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWireless ad hoc networkNode (physics)Mobile ad hoc networkWireless networkComputer securityWireless WANWirelessNetwork packetWi-Fi arrayTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wireless ad-hoc network is a decentralized wireless network that does not have a permanent structure. Client devices are connected to form wireless network. Each node in the network to forward data from one node to another. Based on the connectivity of the network, the node dynamically determinewhich node to forward the data main threats for a secure information exchange in ad hoc networks are the unauthorized access to private data and interference in the operation of equipment and devices in order to disrupt their activity and even disable them.A possible response to these threats is the spread of independent and decentralized networks where each device is a full participant and all share responsibility for safety and security of the network. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of possible attacks. It first explores the reason and security issues in wireless ad hoc network mainly MANET and FANET, then it analyzes various types of most common threats, attacks and unresolved problems that face these types of network. After that it presents the popular security protocols to solve attack problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207