Real-time markerless video tracking of body parts in mice using deep neural networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Markerless and accurate tracking of mouse movement is of interest to many biomedical, pharmaceutical, and behavioral science applications. The additional capability of tracking body parts in real-time with minimal latency opens up the possibility of manipulating motor feedback, allowing detailed explorations of the neural basis for behavioral control. Here we describe a system capable of tracking specific movements in mice at a frame rate of 30.3 Hz. To achieve these results, we adapt DeepLabCut – a robust movement-tracking deep neural network framework – for real-time tracking of body movements in mice. We estimate paw movements of mice in real time and demonstrate the concept of movement-triggered optogenetic stimulation by flashing a USB-CGPIO controlled LED that is triggered when real time analysis of movement exceeds a pre-set threshold. The mean time delay between movement initiation and LED flash was 93.44 ms, a latency sufficient for applying behaviorally-triggered feedback. This manuscript presents the rationale and details of the algorithms employed and shows implementation of the system using behaving mice. This system lays the groundwork for a behavior-triggered ‘closed loop’ brain-machine interface with optogenetic stimulation of specific brain regions for feedback.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".