MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903321730 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2018-0384

Effect of flotation tires used for agricultural field equipment on flexible pavement damage

2018· article· en· W2903321730 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-Pascal Bilodeau, Damien Grellet, Guy Doré, Maurice Phénix

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreadTruckSubgradeAxleRutAxle loadEngineeringAutomotive engineeringEnvironmental scienceStructural engineeringNatural rubberAsphaltMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agricultural field equipment are typically equipped with wide single tires with particular tire tread and low inflation working pressures. Because of the significant differences with standard truck tires, the effect of flotation implement tire on pavement performance and load associated damage is likely to differ. This paper presents the results of an experimental research project where flotation tires were used to test the response of an instrumented flexible pavement built in an indoor test pit. The effect of load, tire pressure, and tire type was investigated as part of the study. Based on the collected results, the tire type and design greatly influence the pavement response. The critical and governing pavement damage mechanism was found to be subgrade structural rutting. Wide specialty tires were found to generally induce less damage than standard truck tires. A method for axle weight adjustment for wide farm tires was proposed as part of the project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicSoil Mechanics and Vehicle DynamicsFrench-language works237,207