MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Venture into Water’s No Man’s Land: Structural Transformations of Solid <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> under Rapid Compression and Decompression

2018· article· lv· W2903374002 on OpenAlexaff
Chuanlong Lin, Jesse S. Smith, Xuqiang Liu, John S. Tse, Wenge Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersScience Challenge ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCrystallizationAmorphous solidMaterials sciencePhase transitionGlass transitionAmorphous icePhase (matter)CrystallographyCompression (physics)ThermodynamicsPhysicsChemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressure-induced formation of amorphous ices and the low-density amorphous (LDA) to high-density amorphous (HDA) transition have been believed to occur kinetically below a crossover temperature (T_{c}) above which thermodynamically driven crystalline-crystalline (e.g., ice I_{h}-to-II) transitions and crystallization of HDA and LDA are dominant. Here we show compression-rate-dependent formation of a high-density noncrystalline (HDN) phase transformed from ice I_{c} above T_{c}, bypassing crystalline-crystalline transitions under rapid compression. Rapid decompression above T_{c} transforms HDN to a low-density noncrystalline (LDN) phase which crystallizes spontaneously into ice I_{c}, whereas slow decompression of HDN leads to direct crystallization. The results indicate the formation of HDA and the HDN-to-LDN transition above T_{c} are results of competition between (de)compression rate, energy barrier, and temperature. The crossover temperature is shown to have an exponential relationship with the threshold compression rate. The present results provide important insight into the dynamic property of the phase transitions in addition to the static study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207