MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903444569 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10996

Dynamics and Control Lunisolar Perturbations for Highly-Eccentric Earth-orbiting Satellites

2015· dissertation· en· W2903444569 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerturbation (astronomy)Orbital eccentricityPhysicsOrbital elementsEccentricity (behavior)Orbital mechanicsClassical mechanicsSatelliteKinematicsGravitationOrbit (dynamics)GeopotentialGeodesyGeologyAerospace engineeringAstronomyPlanetGeophysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellites in highly-eccentric orbits are unique in their ability to spend the majority of their period near the apogee. When these orbits are critically-inclined and have an argument of perigee equal to 270 , they become well-suited for Earth-observation missions for northern regions. However, their orbital characteristics result in a complex and dynamic set of perturbation forces acting on the satellite orbit due to the gravity of the Moon and the Sun, coupled with the perturbations caused by the oblateness of the Earth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlFrench-language works237,207