MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903452714

КОНСТИТУЦІЙНО-ПРАВОВЕ СТАНОВИЩЕ КОРІННИХ НАРОДІВ КАНАДИ: ПРОБЛЕМНІ ПИТАННЯ

2018· article· uk· W2903452714 on OpenAlex
L. D. Varunz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Право» · 2018
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPolitical scienceHuman rightsIndigenous rightsContext (archaeology)Fundamental rightsPopulationLawGeographySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

this article is devoted to the problems of the constitutional and legal status of the indigenous population of Canada. Analyzed and defined the main problems of protection of rights and freedoms of indigenous peoples. It is determined that in the context of the protection of human rights, tendencies in the development of the rights of the indigenous peoples of the world, including Canada, are becoming more visible. The conclusion is made about the need to improve the protection and observance of the rights of indigenous peoples to ensure the constitutional strife of the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0120.016
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0070.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it