Reproductive heat tolerance in a Mojave Desert annual plant, <i>Trianthema portulacastrum</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Reproduction in many crop species is impaired above 30° to 35°C; however, the sensitivity of reproduction in the natural flora remains uncertain. Studies focusing on the effect of high temperature on plant reproduction in wild species are necessary to improve our understanding of how rising global temperatures will impact global plant reproductive success and may ultimately inform models of plant distribution in the future. Additionally, these studies may highlight candidates for thermotolerance that could be further explored for crop improvement. METHODS: We studied reproductive heat tolerance in Trianthema portulacastrum, a weedy species found in hot microsites throughout the tropics and subtropics. Plants were grown at seven day/night temperature combinations: 30°/24°C, 33°/24°C, 36°/24°C, 40°/24°C, 44°/24°C, 24°/40°C, and 40°/40°C to study the effect of both high-day and high-night temperatures. The reproductive parameters measured include anther dehiscence, pollen viability, germination, ovule number, and seed set. KEY RESULTS: Pollen viability and germination declined with increasing daytime temperature up to 44°C, but this did not affect fruit production or seed set. Seed set was reduced under high night temperature. Continuous high temperature over the day and night (40°C day/40°C night) decreased pollen viability by half and reduced seed set by two-thirds. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate Trianthema portulacastrum has much higher reproductive thermotolerance than commonly identified in crop species, and though inhibited, can retain fecundity at 40°C. Through a combination of night escape and increased thermal tolerance, it maintains fertility in the hot microsites of its natural environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".