α‐2‐Macroglobulin induces the shedding of microvesicles from cutaneous wound myofibroblasts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microvesicles (MVs) are recognized as an important class of cell-to-cell messengers. Although the properties of MVs are increasingly documented, the mechanisms regulating MV biogenesis remain debated. Myofibroblasts are a key cellular component of wound healing and have been shown to produce MVs upon stimulation with serum. However, the mediator(s) responsible for the observed effect of serum on MV release have yet to be identified. To isolate the molecule(s) of interest, serum proteins were sequentially separated using chromatography, selective precipitation, and electrophoresis. MV production was assessed throughout the purification and after stimulation of myofibroblasts with two potent purified molecules. α-2-Macroglobulin (A2M) was thereby found to dose-dependently stimulate MV release. We confirmed the presence of the A2M receptor, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP1), on myofibroblasts. Inhibition of LRP1 resulted in a significant decrease in MV production. Together, our results suggest that A2M positively regulates MV shedding through the activation of LRP1 on myofibroblasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".