An accurate TMT-based approach to quantify and model lysine susceptibility to conjugation via N-hydroxysuccinimide esters in a monoclonal antibody
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Conjugation of small molecules to proteins through N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) esters results in a random distribution of small molecules on lysine residues and the protein N-terminus. While mass spectrometry methods have improved characterization of these protein conjugates, it remains a challenge to quantify the occupancy at individual sites of conjugation. Here, we present a method using Tandem Mass Tags (TMT) that enabled the accurate and sensitive quantification of occupancy at individual conjugation sites in the NIST monoclonal antibody. At conjugation levels relevant to antibody drug conjugates in the clinic, site occupancy data was obtained for 37 individual sites, with average site occupancy data across 2 adjacent lysines obtained for an additional 12 sites. Thus, altogether, a measure of site occupancy was obtained for 98% of the available primary amines. We further showed that removal of the Fc-glycan on the NIST mAb increased conjugation at two specific sites in the heavy chain, demonstrating the utility of this method to identify changes in the susceptibility of individual sites to conjugation. This improved site occupancy data allowed calibration of a bi-parametric linear model for predicting the susceptibility of individual lysines to conjugation from 3D-structure based on their solvent exposures and ionization constants. Trained against the experimental data for lysines from the Fab fragment, the model provided accurate predictions of occupancies at lysine sites from the Fc region and the protein N-terminus (R2 = 0.76). This predictive model will enable improved engineering of antibodies for optimal labeling with fluorophores, toxins, or crosslinkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".