Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter examines the composition of the novel before comparing it to the structure of other works. Vollmann reiterates the opening of the novel several times in the course of the narration, to inscribe what he deems the loss of teleological order in history in his style and composition. An experience in disorientation, the novel takes up the poetic echo of the opening sentence “Walking south and south [...]” (3) several times, not only to stress that the English explorers and the contemporary American character Subzero are lost in time and space, as well as lost philosophically speaking, but also to indicate a reflection on the novel and a possible reading method. To walk south continuously within the Polar Circle means that one follows the course of the sun at all times of day in the summer. The redundancy of the expression “south and south” emphasizes the circularity of such a course and thus its endlessness. The novel uses the course of Phaeton as a structural topic. The son of the Sun in Greek mythology, Phaeton ran his father’s chariot so recklessly that he was struck by Zeus’s lightning. Like him, the explorer John Franklin and his contemporary avatar Subzero follow a course of Promethean defiance toward the fire of the sun, testing limits to great personal risk. Franklin loses his life, and Subzero endangers his sanity, and his life as well, when he stays on an isolated base at the North Pole.By returning to the opening of the novel at intervals, Vollmann structures the vertigo of the characters’ jumbled sensory perceptions in an extreme environment, for which they are ill-equipped in their quest for meaning. The syntax and the vocabulary reflect their desire to apprehend the otherness of polar experience on new terms, and their difficulty to do so in any argumentative manner, thus making way for a new poetics. In his other works, Vollmann also tends to use echoing structures, such as the palindrome composition in The Atlas (1996), or the leitmotivs that structure Imperial (2009), like so many burdens or refrains. Echoes, symmetry, mirroring composition and stylistic figures (such as the anadiplosis or the chiasmus) are the various ways he uses to suggest the depth of experience and an intuition of infinity. Structure marks the ultimate form of Vollmann’s lyricism, as his process of composition deliberately invites the reader to take part in the connecting game laid out by the echoing text, to become an active reader and a sharer of dreams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".