Les pratiques BDSM queer et le fist-fucking dans Quatrième génération et Insurrections ! en territoire sexuel de Wendy Delorme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, je propose d’analyser la représentation des pratiques BDSM, telles que l’ondinisme, la soumission et la domination ainsi que le fist-fucking dans deux ouvrages de Wendy Delorme : Quatrième génération (2007) et Insurrections ! en territoire sexuel (2009). De plus en plus d’études se font à l’égard des pratiques sexuelles non normatives, comme le BDSM, et les textes de Delorme contribuent justement à ces études. Ses textes permettent non seulement d’offrir une plus grande visibilité aux minorités sexuelles, mais aussi de célébrer leur existence. Tout en me basant sur des théories féministes et queer (Bauer, Califia, Jagose, Rubin, entre autres), je vise à montrer la manière dont Wendy Delorme démystifie les préjugés associés aux pratiques BDSM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".