MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Visual lnertial Hybridization Technique based on Beacons identified by Deep Learning

2018· article· en· W2903713534 on OpenAlexaff
V. Demange, J. Nicolaou, Fabrice Delhaye, Erickson Robert, Joel Budin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeaconArtificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer scienceSightPoint (geometry)Line-of-sightVisualizationLine (geometry)Position (finance)Sensor fusionReal-time computingEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Safran has been working for several years on autonomy of vehicles. Whether it is airborne with the UAV Patroller, or on the ground with the military vehicle eRider and with the civilian autonomous car in cooperation with Valeo. This paper focuses on the use of visual information to improve the localization of the car, more precisely, it presents, from a theoretical point of view, the hybridization of the inertial sensors measurement with the line of sight of known position visual beacons: road signs detected on the camera image thanks to deep learning. This fusion algorithm has been implemented in a prototype version of Safran's well know Epsilon 10 navigator and simulation results as well as first real-time results are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207