MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903751892 · doi:10.1109/norchip.2018.8573462

Multi-Swarm based NoC Configuration and Synthesis

2018· article· en· W2903751892 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Obaidullah, Gul N. Khan, Fei Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork on a chipComputer scienceInterconnectionSwarm behaviourParticle swarm optimizationLatency (audio)Power consumptionTabu searchChipParallel computingPower (physics)Embedded systemComputer networkAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network-on-Chip (NoC) is a popular interconnection structure suited to many-core System-on-Chip (SoC). Assuming a mesh-based NoC, we explore the assignment of cores to NoC nodes and produce a best NoC configuration having minimal communication traffic, power consumption, and chip area. We employ pre-synthesized NoC components data to estimate power and area consumption of the interconnection network. NoC configuration and mapping problem is NP-hard, and we propose a hybrid scheme of swarm optimization that combines Tabu-list, sub-swarms, and Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization (DPSO). The main goal is to configure and synthesize NoC such that the total NoC latency, power consumption, and chip area are minimal. DPSO is used as the main optimization scheme and modified it such that each swarm particle move is influenced by NoC traffic. The methodology is tested for some multimedia application core graphs. It is determined that on average our tool reduced NoC area by 30% on average and reduced total NoC power (static + worst case dynamic) by 27.5% as compared to unoptimized NoCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207