Bibliographic record
Abstract
Constitutional law – Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Freedom of conscience and religion – Interference with – Private religious university (TWU) sought accreditation for a new law school from Canadian Federation of Law Societies – Law Society of Upper Canada (LSUC) denied accreditation on grounds of TWU’s code of conduct prohibiting sexual intimacy outside of traditional marriage – TWU claiming judicial review of Law Society’s decision on grounds of breach of religious freedom – Ontario Divisional Court and Ontario Court of Appeal refusing claim – TWU appealing to Supreme Court – Whether Law Society decision reasonable within the Doré/Loyola administrative law framework giving deference to original decision maker in accordance with decision maker’s expertise – Whether Law Society entitled to take into account admissions policy of law school – Whether there had been a proportionate balance of Charter protections and statutory objectives—Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act 1982, being sch B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, ch 11, preamble, ss 1, 2(a) - Law Society Act, RSO 1990, c L.8, ss 4.1, 4.2
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".