MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903792652 · doi:10.1109/crv.2018.00054

Simple Real-Time Multi-face Tracking Based on Convolutional Neural Networks

2018· article· en· W2903792652 on OpenAlexafffund
Xile Li, Jochen Lang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBitTorrent trackerComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkFacial motion captureComputer visionTracking (education)Face (sociological concept)False positive paradoxFeature (linguistics)Feature extractionFace detectionSimple (philosophy)Facial recognition systemPattern recognition (psychology)Eye tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simple real-time system that is able to track multiple faces for live videos, broadcast, real-time conference recording, etc. Our proposed tracking system is comprised of three parts: face detection, feature extraction and tracking. We employ a previously proposed cascaded Multi-Task Convolutional Neural Network (MTCNN) to detect a face, a simple CNN to extract the features of detected faces and show that a shallow network for face tracking based on the extracted feature maps of the face is sufficient. Our multi-face tracker runs in real-time without any on-line training. We do not adjust any parameters according to different input videos, and the tracker's run-time will not significantly increase with an increase in the number of faces being tracked, i.e., it is easy to deploy in new real-time applications. We evaluate our tracker based on two commonly used metrics in comparison to five recent face trackers. Our proposed simple tracker can perform competitively in comparison to these trackers despite occlusions in the videos and false positives or false negatives during face detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207