MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903799117 · doi:10.7202/1054160ar

L’agir ensemble en contexte d’école inclusive : qu’en dit la littérature scientifique récente ? 1

2018· article· fr· W2903799117 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance BoviteqUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Notre travail part du constat d’un manque de clarté dans la définition de l’école inclusive et, plus précisément, d’une de ses composantes importantes, « l’agir ensemble ». Une recension de la littérature scientifique récente, francophone et anglophone, permet d’analyser l’usage qui en est fait. Cette recension réalisée à partir de textes scientifiques issus de bases de données reconnues (ERIC, Medline, PsycINFO et SocINDEX, CAIRN) a permis d’identifier 26 textes qui abordent « l’agir ensemble » et l’école inclusive. L’analyse de ces derniers confirme qu’ils ne sont que très rarement traités en parallèle et que les travaux récents continuent à les faire cohabiter, le plus souvent sans les définir, alors même qu’ils relèvent de paradigmes différents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it