MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903808003 · doi:10.2138/rmg.2018.84.4

Analytical Techniques for Probing Small-Scale Layers that Preserve Information on Gas–Solid Interactions

2018· article· en· W2903808003 on OpenAlexaff
Kim N. Dalby, J. A. Berger, Helen E. A. Brand, Julie M. Cairney, Katja Eder, Stephen M. Eggins, Anna L. Herring, R. L. Hervig, Peter B. Kreider, Terrence P. Mernagh, Andrew B. Palm, Christian J. Renggli, Ulrike Troitzsch, Lindsey Yue, P. L. King

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials Characterization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceMedia studiesArt historyHistorySociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been 23 years (as we type) since Carroll and Holloway published the “Volatiles in Magmas” MSA volume (Carroll and Holloway 1994). The 1994 volume dealt with how to safely sample high-temperature gases and analytical methods for volatiles in glasses, which included secondary ion mass spectroscopy and vibrational spectroscopy. Since that time, some things have changed, and some have remained the same. There is still a disconnect between laboratory models of high-temperature gas–solid processes and field observations (Cashman et al. 2017), but we are starting to close that gap with rapid advances in technology. © 2018 Mineralogical Society of America

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Mineralogy and GeochemistrySame topicAdvanced Materials Characterization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207