Performance Characteristics of a Suspended‐Catalyst Oscillatory Membrane Photocatalytic Reactor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The performance characteristics of an oscillatory membrane photocatalytic reactor were investigated using dye degradation over a suspended ZnO catalyst as a model reaction. Both flat‐surface membranes and ones with transverse turbulence promoters (TP) were used. Application of oscillatory motion can be effective in enhancing the performance of suspended‐catalyst membrane photocatalytic reactors. The eddy formation and vortex shedding when using membranes with TP gave rise to several synergistic effects by providing effective removal of catalyst deposits from the membrane surface, which enhanced the flux and increased the suspended‐catalyst fraction in solution, which consequently enhanced the reaction rate. The effective mixing in the reaction channel minimized particles sedimentation and agglomeration which further enhanced the catalyst suspension and increased its effective reaction area. The specific energy consumption favorably compared to a membrane cross‐flow filtration system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it