MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903834541

DEVELOPING AN INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER E-TOOL IN THE FIELD OF BIO-ECONOMY

2018· article· en· W2903834541 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emilia Câmpean, Marcel Beldean, Mihai Dragomir, Gabriel Vlăduţ

Bibliographic record

VenueACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS - Series: APPLIED MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS, and ENGINEERING · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWork (physics)Field (mathematics)BusinessDigital economyQuarter (Canadian coin)The InternetSustainable developmentSocial mediaEngineeringEconomyPolitical scienceComputer scienceEconomicsWorld Wide WebGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The way business is conducted, the way people live, work, socialize and meet have changed dramatically in the past quarter century, and more so in the past decade, due to the development of digital innovative solutions. From the internet to smartphones, from 3D printing to social media, technology is creating an environment that is interactive, integrated and available for everyone. The paper presents an online e-tool that will help create bridges between SMEs, research institutes and public authorities in the Danube area. Creating this platform for the development of innovative solutions facilitates the communication and collaboration of actors in the Danube Region, with multiplying effects in the field of bio-economy. The platform increases the possibilities of creating innovative products by making explicit the mechanisms through which the market in the bio-economy sector works, thus leading to the attainment of sustainable solutions for the Danube Region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS - Series: APPLIED MATHEMATICS, MECHANICS, and ENGINEERINGSame topicBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207