MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903853719 · doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.051

Fabrication of Ni@SiC composite nanofibers by electrospinning and autocatalytic electroless plating techniques

2018· article· en· W2903853719 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nan Wu, Su Ju, Yingde Wang, Dingding Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrodeposition and Electroless Coatings
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsElectrospinningElectroless platingFabricationNanofiberMaterials scienceComposite numberAutocatalysisPlating (geology)NanotechnologyGold plating (software engineering)Composite materialChemical engineeringElectroplatingLayer (electronics)ChemistryCatalysisPolymerEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, nickel-coated silicon carbide (Ni@SiC) nanofibers were successfully fabricated via electrospinning and autocatalytic electroless plating techniques. The in situ formed nickel oxide (NiO) seeds on the surface of SiC nanofibers were applied to catalyze the plating reaction instead of expensive palladium. The quality of nickel layer was determined by the reaction temperature, deposition time and NiO content in the fibers. After electroless plating for 2 h at 70 °C, the thickness of nickel layer was 60 nm and the average diameter of composite nanofibers was 610 nm. The volume density of the obtained Ni@SiC fibrous membrane was measured to be 1.3 g cm−3. Such composite fibrous membranes with uniform nickel coating and interconnected pore structure possess potential applications as catalysts, supercapacitor and shielding materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in PhysicsSame topicElectrodeposition and Electroless CoatingsFrench-language works237,207