MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903863538 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2018.8557944

A Remotely Control Dimming System for LED Lamps with Power Factor Correction

2018· article· en· W2903863538 on OpenAlexaff
Radwa M. Abdalaal, Carl Ngai Man Ho, Carson K. Leung, Nibrasul I. Ohin, Syed Habib Ur Rehman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDimmerTRIACLED lampPower factorElectrical engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Total harmonic distortionComputer scienceVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern street lighting systems require an energy-efficient dimmable road lighting system with even light distribution for safety and energy saving purposes. Existing standard TRIAC-based dimmers introduce power quality issues especially for a large-scale lighting network. This paper proposes a dimming control technique for Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamps, while maintaining high voltage and current quality. Dimming function is achieved by connecting a Voltage Source Converter (VSC) dimmer system between the AC supply and the lighting load. The VSC dimmer system will achieve high power factor and low current harmonic distortion when dimming the LED lamps. The VSC system is a comprehensive solution for most of power quality problems in the network. A VSC dimmer system prototype of 500 VA 120V has been built. An advanced feature is added to the VSC dimmer system to remotely send/receive messages between the system and the user through a Graphical User Interface (GUI). Specifically, the user can communicate with the VSC dimmer system by using Raspberry Pi. Experimental results and power analysis comparison between utilizing the TRIAC-based dimmer and the VSC dimmer system for dimming function are discussed. Setting a dimming profile to endorse energy saving will be discussed as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207