MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903863698 · doi:10.3233/ch-189408

Laser Doppler-based measurements of periarticular blood flux can be utilized for assessment of arthritis pain: A hypothesis

2018· article· en· W2903863698 on OpenAlexaff
Noura Motabbakani, Christine Lehmann

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaser Doppler velocimetryMedicineArthritisBlood flowVasodilationPerfusionMicrocirculationDoppler effectInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthritis often presents with serious pain of the affected joints. The pain results mainly from underlying inflammatory processes initiated by the immune response to the degenerative structural changes within the joints and is associated with microvascular vasodilation that increases articular blood flow. Laser Doppler-based methods facilitate reliable quantification of microvascular perfusion. We hypothesize that laser Doppler-based measurements of periarticular blood flux can be utilized for assessment of arthritis pain in patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Hemorheology and MicrocirculationSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207