MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903869689 · doi:10.1101/502146

Seed masting causes fluctuations in optimum litter size and lag load in a seed predator

2018· preprint· en· W2903869689 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew G. McAdam, Stan Boutin, Ben Dantzer, Jeff Lane

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Guelph
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationPolar Knowledge CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPredationMast (botany)BiologyPredatorMaladaptationLitterEcologySeed predationBiological dispersalPopulationSeed dispersalMast cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The episodic production of large seed crops by some perennial plants, is referred to as masting and is known to increase seed escape by alternately starving and swamping seed predators. These pulses of resources, however, might also act as an agent of selection on the life histories of seed predators, which could indirectly enhance seed escape by inducing an evolutionary load on seed predator populations. Lag loads in seed predators could result from mast-induced shifts in optimum phenotypes that exceed the capacity of seed predators to adaptively track optimum phenotypes through phenotypic plasticity. Alternatively, masting could generate mismatches in selection across generations, where adaptation to the parental environment leads to maladaptation in the offspring environment. Here we measured natural selection on female North American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) across 28 years and five white spruce (Picea glauca) masting events. Red squirrel litter sizes were similar to optimum litter sizes during non-mast years, but were well below optimum litter sizes during resource-rich mast years. Mast events, therefore caused selection for larger litters (B = 0.25) and a lag load (L = 0.25) on red squirrels during mast years. Furthermore, we found that the annual fitness of spruce trees was negatively related to the local density of squirrels during mast years, indicating that the observed lag load on squirrels enhanced the number of spruce cones escaping squirrel predation. Although, the frequency of mast events and the demography of red squirrels were such that offspring and parents often experienced opposite environments with respect to the mast, we found no effect of environmental mismatches across generations on either offspring survival or population growth. Instead, squirrels plastically increased litter sizes in anticipation of mast events, which partially, although not completely, reduced the lag load resulting from this change in food availability. Variable selection on litter size caused by white spruce mast events, therefore, induced a lag load on the population of red squirrels that was not affected by whether individual squirrels were born during mast (matching) or non-mast (mismatching) conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207