MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903872674 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v2i2.700

Une approche éducative novatrice pour outiller les enfants souffrant d’embonpoint ou d’obésité

2018· article· fr· W2903872674 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Louise Savard, Manon Doucet

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGynecologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’obésité infantile est d’actualité et très préoccupante à l’échelle planétaire. En 2013, un enfant québécois sur quatre présentait un surplus de poids. Jusqu’à maintenant, la grande majorité des interventions luttant contre cette épidémie demeure centrée sur la nutrition et l’activité physique. Peu d’interventions éducatives touchent directement les mécanismes psychologiques à l’origine de la suralimentation ou de l’inactivité. Cet article a pour but de présenter l’état de la situation et de proposer une nouvelle approche éducative pour intervenir auprès des enfants souffrant d’embonpoint ou d’obésité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207