MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903892856 · doi:10.1522/rhe.v2i2.676

L'influence des représentations sociales dans le développement professionnel des futurs enseignants : le cas de l’évaluation des apprentissages

2018· article· fr· W2903892856 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nicole Monney, Monique L’Hostie, Sylvie Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue hybride de l éducation · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une recherche visant à dégager les représentations sociales (RS) de l’évaluation des apprentissages chez quatre stagiaires finissantes en enseignement primaire. Les chercheurs ont opté pour la méthode de l’entretien d’autoconfrontation pour cerner l’interaction entre les RS et les savoirs universitaires. L’analyse réalisée à partir de la théorie des RS et des processus d’objectivation et d’ancrage met de l’avant une résistance au changement dans les pratiques évaluatives. La conclusion soulève des pistes de réflexion pour revoir les rôles des formateurs, la place du stage et le statut des savoirs issus de la recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.531
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.030 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue hybride de l éducationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207