Localization of Activation Origin on Patient-Specific Endocardial Surface by the Equivalent Double Layer (EDL) Source Model With Sparse Bayesian Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ablation treatment of ventricular arrhythmias can be facilitated by pre-procedure planning aided by electrocardiographic inverse solution, which can help to localize the origin of arrhythmia. Our aim was to improve localization accuracy of the inverse solution for activation originating on the left-ventricular endocardial surface, by using a sparse Bayesian learning (SBL). METHODS: The inverse problem of electrocardiography was solved by reconstructing endocardial potentials from time integrals of body-surface electrocardiograms and from patient-specific geometry of the heart and torso for three patients with structurally normal ventricular myocardium, who underwent endocardial catheter mapping that included pace mapping. Complementary simulations using dipole sources in patient-specific geometry were also performed. The proposed method is using sparse property of the equivalent-double-layer (EDL) model of cardiac sources; it employs the SBL and makes use of the spatio-temporal features of the cardiac action potentials. RESULTS: The mean localization error of the proposed method for pooled pacing sites ( n=52) was significantly smaller ( p=0.0039) than that achieved for the same patients in the study of Erem et al. Simulation experiments localized the source dipoles ( n=48) from forward-simulated potentials with the error of 9.4 ± 4.5 mm (mean ± SD). CONCLUSION: The results of our clinical and simulation experiments demonstrate that localization of left-ventricular endocardial activation by means of the Bayesian approach, based on sparse representation of sources by EDL, is feasible and accurate. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed approach to localizing endocardial sources may have important applications in pre-procedure assessment of arrhythmias and in guiding their ablation treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".