RESENHA: ATLAS DO BRASIL: DISPARIDADES E DINÂMICAS DO TERRITÓRIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A terceira edição do Atlas do Brasil de autoria de Hervé Théry e Neli Aparecida de Mello-Théry, permite visualizar o território brasileiro e suas dinâmicas e disparidades existentes nesse país continental. Essa edição faz um balanço analítico e reflexivo sobre as mudanças no território brasileiro nos últimos 10 anos, fornecendo aos leitores um conjunto de informações textuais e visuais dessas dinâmicas que estão atreladas às políticas públicas que foram sendo realizadas paulatinamente pelo governo federal, seja com objetivo de reduzir as desigualdades sociais e regionais ou ampliar as infraestruturas existentes e, obviamente, as dinâmicas econômicas internas do país. No livro apresentam-se alguns indicadores que apontam avanços e retrocessos entre os dados tabulados e publicados na primeira edição do Atlas em 2005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".