MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903927360 · doi:10.4324/9781315575827-5

Disguising the Sense of Insecurity in ‘Multicultural’ Greece 1

2016· book-chapter· en· W2903927360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Petronoti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary and Historical Greek Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismSense (electronics)PsychologyEngineeringPedagogyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter addresses the symbiosis of a discourse that forwards the multiculturalization of Modern Greek society with voices admitting the 'uninterrupted continuity' of its cultural homogeneity. Criticisms of liberal-humanist visions of multiculturalism and the integration of ethnocultural groups recur in studies on Canada where multiculturalism emerged as a mode of nation-building. Relevant measures involved explicit recognition to Canadians whose origin was non-French, non-British and non-Aboriginal, thereby including ethnocultural and racial minorities. Yet, cultural barriers are set to immigrant's political mobilization and full participation in the division of power and resources. The Greek version of multiculturalism is grounded in the precedence that national culture supposedly enjoys over immigrant's history and traditions. In essence, multiculturalist claims are intended to disguise the fact that the pressures raised by the 'novelty' of immigration have not given birth to radical changes in relevant institutions and infrastructures. Turner promptly states that the multiculturalist language developed by cultural nationalists reduces culture to a licence for political separatism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContemporary and Historical Greek StudiesFrench-language works237,207