MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903927360 · doi:10.4324/9781315575827-5

Disguising the Sense of Insecurity in ‘Multicultural’ Greece 1

2016· book-chapter· en· W2903927360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marina Petronoti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicContemporary and Historical Greek Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismSense (electronics)PsychologyEngineeringPedagogyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter addresses the symbiosis of a discourse that forwards the multiculturalization of Modern Greek society with voices admitting the &s;uninterrupted continuity&s; of its cultural homogeneity. Criticisms of liberal-humanist visions of multiculturalism and the integration of ethnocultural groups recur in studies on Canada where multiculturalism emerged as a mode of nation-building. Relevant measures involved explicit recognition to Canadians whose origin was non-French, non-British and non-Aboriginal, thereby including ethnocultural and racial minorities. Yet, cultural barriers are set to immigrant&s;s political mobilization and full participation in the division of power and resources. The Greek version of multiculturalism is grounded in the precedence that national culture supposedly enjoys over immigrant&s;s history and traditions. In essence, multiculturalist claims are intended to disguise the fact that the pressures raised by the &s;novelty&s; of immigration have not given birth to radical changes in relevant institutions and infrastructures. Turner promptly states that the multiculturalist language developed by cultural nationalists reduces culture to a licence for political separatism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.061
Scholarly communication0.0110.009
Open science0.0010.015
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContemporary and Historical Greek StudiesFrench-language works237,207