Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’oeuvre de Georg Simmel est une mine conceptuelle pour celui qui cherche à penser l’évolution moderne du sens de la liberté. En opposant l’individualisme quantitatif duxviiieà l’individualisme qualitatif duxixesiècle, il permet de distinguer deux formes de liberté individuelle au sein du concept général de « liberté des modernes ». En analysant l’emprise sociale de l’argent, il diagnostique la menace qu’elle fait planer à son époque : enfermer les humains dans une liberté purement négative. Il souligne aussi la tentation de chercher une issue individuelle dans la liberté intérieure, concept d’origine stoïcienne expurgé de sa dimension morale. Enfin, il est attentif à l’émergence d’une quête de délivrance à l’égard de la vie matérielle qui se manifeste dans certaines formes pathologiques de possession monétaire, mais aussi dans la passion pour l’art, le goût de la sociabilité et la recherche de solutions techniques aux questions politiques. Néanmoins, on peut regretter que ces fines analyses accordent si peu de place à la dimension collective et politique de la liberté, geste symptomatique de la tendance de fond que Simmel analyse et incarne : penser la liberté dans l’élaboration de la différence personnelle plus que dans le déploiement de l’indépendance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".