MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W290398013

Navigating the Shifting Sands of Occupational Therapy: Lessons from Wise Wayfinders

2011· article· en· W290398013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
W. Dean Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Zealand journal of occupational therapy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpatial Cognition and Navigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDestinationsHomecomingFocus (optics)SociologySymbol (formal)HistoryAestheticsVisual artsAdvertisingTourismComputer scienceArchaeologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 1960s, Kevin Lynch, an architect and leading environmental design theorist of his time, introduced the word, wayfinding, into the English lexicon (Banerjee & Southworthy, 1996). Unlike the related and more traditional word, wayfaring, which means simply traveling, the word, wayfinding, suggests that desirable destinations await those who navigate their journeys successfully. By its very definition then, wayfinding is about getting to where one wants to be, whether that destination happens to be a safe place for rest or nourishing growth along the way or a final homecoming after a long arduous journey. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] The concept of wayfinding can be about much more than just landing intact at a physical destination. Wayfinding also applies to the ways in which we navigate turbulence in our personal and professional lives, such as the shifting sands of occupational therapy in New Zealand and beyond. My focus is thus upon wayfinding as a dynamic process for making our way using strategies that help to transform ourselves and our profession as we navigate ever-changing landscapes. To covey this focus, I will rely upon the symbol of an inukshuk. Inukshuks are landmarks comprised of large and sometimes massive stones that look like a human being and communicate to travelers, I have been this way before you and it is a good way (Figure 1). As you may know, generations of the Inuit Eskimos in Alaska and Canada built inukshuks to guide travelers through the harsh and constantly changing landscapes of the Pacific Northwest. In this paper, I primarily address four wayfinding strategies, which I think of as symbolic inukshuks. These inukshuks are: (1) lean into disorienting dilemmas and persevere; (2) learn from those who illuminate the necessity of occupation; (3) feed your intellectual curiosity about the field; and (4) find your empowering community. I derived these inukshuks from a systematic analysis of contributions to a Firm Persuasion in Our Work, a forum in the American Journal of Occupational Therapy in which occupational therapists with honorable careers reflected upon their professional journeys and shared pivotal lessons and insights gleaned along the way. Based on their journeys, I conclude with a fifth inukshuk: Build robust communities through compelling occupational visions. I offer these inukshuks humbly. I have not directly experienced the shifting sands that occupational therapists in New Zealand or any other country beyond the United States encounter. Thus I can only hope that you find the wayfinding strategies suggested herein of some value and applicability to where you live and work each day. Inukshuk #1: Lean into disorienting dilemmas and persevere Occupational therapists inevitably encounter a wealth of disorienting dilemmas over the course their careers. According to Mezirow (2000), disorienting dilemmas arise from challenging and unexpected experiences that throw former understandings of how things work and what things mean out of kilter; as a result, they defy usual responses and solutions and thereby prompt careful rethinking of how best to proceed. The question is what should one do when confronted with a disorienting dilemma: brush it aside or lean into it and persevere? Contributors to a Firm Persuasion in our Work suggest that the wisest response is often the latter. For leaning into disorienting dilemmas can open up new ways of imagining and doing occupational therapy, sometimes to the benefit of communities that extend beyond our corner of the world. Journeying deeper and further In Deeper into the Heart of the Matter, Betty Hasselkus (2004) described her professional journey as one of ever-deepening understandings of the nature and possibilities of occupational therapy. Hasselkus acknowledged that she never could have imagined this journey in the 1950s when she got married the same week that she graduated from college. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.024
Scholarly communication0.0140.021
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Zealand journal of occupational therapySame topicSpatial Cognition and NavigationFrench-language works237,207