MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904036678 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2886010

Optimizing Content Dissemination for Real-Time Traffic Management in Large-Scale Internet of Vehicle Systems

2018· article· en· W2904036678 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojie Wang, Zhaolong Ning, Xiping Hu, Lei Wang, Bin Hu, Jun Cheng, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaTianjin UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThe InternetScale (ratio)Computer scienceComputer networkInternet trafficMultimediaWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an application of “smart transport” for Internet of Things, Internet of Vehicle (IoV) has emerged as a new research field based on vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs). With the development of smart vehicles and the integration of sensors, applications of traffic management and road safety in large-scale IoV systems have drawn great attentions. By sensing events occurred on roads, vehicles can broadcast messages to inform others about traffic jams or accidents. However, the store-carry-and-forward transmission pattern may cause a large transmission delay, making the implementation of large-scale traffic management difficult. In this paper, we put forward a feasible solution to minimize the response time for traffic management service, by enabling real-time content dissemination based on heterogeneous network access in IoV systems. We first design a crowdsensing-based system model for large-scale IoV systems. Then, a cluster-based optimization framework is investigated to provide timely responses for traffic management. Specifically, we estimate the message transmission delay by stochastic theory, which can provide a guideline for the next-hop relay selection in our delay-sensitive routing scheme. Furthermore, network performances are evaluated based on two city-road maps, and performance metrics, containing average delivery delay, average delivery ratio, average communication cost, and access ratio, demonstrate the superiority of our system. Finally, we conclude our work and discuss the further work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations91
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207