MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904057692 · doi:10.1063/1.5054842

Nanowires for energy: A review

2018· review· en· W2904057692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceNanowirePhotovoltaicsOptoelectronicsWaferThermoelectric effectThermoelectric materialsSemiconductorFigure of meritNanotechnologyHeterojunctionEnergy conversion efficiencyThin filmSeebeck coefficientThermal conductivityEngineering physicsPhotovoltaic systemComposite materialElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Semiconductor nanowires (NWs) represent a new class of materials and a shift from conventional two-dimensional bulk thin films to three-dimensional devices. Unlike thin film technology, lattice mismatch strain in NWs can be relaxed elastically at the NW free surface without dislocations. This capability can be used to grow unique heterostructures and to grow III-V NWs directly on inexpensive substrates, such as Si, rather than lattice-matched but more expensive III-V substrates. This capability, along with other unique properties (quantum confinement and light trapping), makes NWs of great interest for next generation optoelectronic devices with improved performance, new functionalities, and reduced cost. One of the many applications of NWs includes energy conversion. This review will outline applications of NWs in photovoltaics, thermoelectrics, and betavoltaics (direct conversion of solar, thermal, and nuclear energy, respectively, into electrical energy) with an emphasis on III-V materials. By transitioning away from bulk semiconductor thin films or wafers, high efficiency photovoltaic cells comprised of III-V NWs grown on Si would improve performance and take advantage of cheaper materials, larger wafer sizes, and improved economies of scale associated with the mature Si industry. The thermoelectric effect enables a conversion of heat into electrical power via the Seebeck effect. NWs present an opportunity to increase the figure of merit (ZT) of thermoelectric devices by decreasing the thermal conductivity (κ) due to surface phonon backscattering from the NW surface boundaries. Quantum confinement in sufficiently thin NWs can also increase the Seebeck coefficient by modification of the electronic density of states. Prospects for III-V NWs in thermoelectric devices, including solar thermoelectric generators, are discussed. Finally, betavoltaics refers to the direct generation of electrical power in a semiconductor from a radioactive source. This betavoltaic process is similar to photovoltaics in which photon energy is converted to electrical energy. In betavoltaics, however, energetic electrons (beta particles) are used instead of photons to create electron-hole pairs in the semiconductor by impact ionization. NWs offer the opportunity for improved beta capture efficiency by almost completely surrounding the radioisotope with semiconductor material. Improving the efficiency is important in betavoltaic design because of the high cost of materials and manufacturing, regulatory restrictions on the amount of radioactive material used, and the enabling of new applications with higher power requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it