Automatic Inductance Measurements of Synchronous Reluctance Machines Including Cross-Saturation Using Real-Time Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new approach to the inductance measurement of a synchronous reluctance machine. Instead of an open loop pulsed voltage reference described in many references, a pulsed current reference is applied to the test machine in closed loop. The response of the machine is measured, and voltage and current samples are processed (integration) in real time to calculate the flux linkages and inductances. Since the measurement is done in current control mode, the time constant of the overall system can be modified in such a way that a sufficient number of samples are available during the transient even for machines with smaller time constants. This improves the accuracy of the measurement for low time constant machines compared to the voltage reference based measurement. Additionally, inductance at a desired operating point is obtained in a single trial; this reduces the duration of the measurement process. Unlike the pulsed voltage reference method that requires post processing of a huge data set to calculate the inductance map of the machine, the proposed method can be programmed in a real time processor to automate the generation of an inductance map of the test machine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it