MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904074654 · doi:10.13130/2035-7680/10840

La typographie américaine de Dany Laferrière

2018· article· fr· W2904074654 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ylenia De Luca

Bibliographic record

VenueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCaribbean and African Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMiamiArtFrenchEthnologyArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following article focuses on the American Anthology by Dany Laferrière, a writer originally from Haiti who decided, following his voluntary exile in Québec, to publish exclusively in Montreal and in French and to live in Miami. "Auteur déplacé", he does not like classifications: black, Haitian, French, Quebec, etc., but is considered an American writer tout court. His Americanness, accompanied by an opaque, nomadic and wandering writing style, reveals a plural identity belonging and a hybrid cultural belonging. Montréal, Miami, New York are just his writing spaces, because for Laferrière literature is a journey and not a place of confinement. L'article suivant est axé sur l'Anthologie américaine de Dany Laferrière, écrivain originaire de Haïti qui a néanmoins décidé, à la suite de son exil volontaire au Québec, de publier exclusivement à Montréal et en français et de vivre à Miami. “Auteur déplacé”, il n'aime pas les classifications (noir, haïtien, francophone, québécois, etc.), mais il se considère comme un écrivain américain tout court. Son américanité, accompagnée d'une écriture opaque, nomade et errante, révèle une appartenance identitaire plurielle et une appartenance culturelle hybride. Montréal, Miami, New York ne sont que ses espaces d'écriture car, pour Laferrière, la littérature est un voyage et non pas une frontière.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)Same topicCaribbean and African Literature and CultureFrench-language works237,207