Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le docteur Andre-Francois Bourbeau est surtout connu du grand public comme etant celui qui a etabli en 1984 le record Guiness de la plus longue periode de survie volontaire en milieu sauvage. Apres ce periple unique tres mediatise, monsieur Bourbeau avait consigne meticuleusement ses observations dans ce qui allait devenir le livre Surviethon au gre de la nature, paru aux Editions JCL en 1988. Vingt-cinq ans plus tard, bien de l'eau a coule dans les rivieres que monsieur Bourbeau et son compagnon avaient alors empruntees a l'epoque. Fort d'un quart de siecle d'enseignement a l'Universite du Quebec a Chicoutimi au Baccalaureat en plein air et tourisme d'aventure, il etait evident que l'auteur devait faire le proces de son aventure unique, a la lumiere de son experience comme chercheur universitaire dans le domaine. Monsieur Bourbeau nous livre donc ses decouvertes les plus recentes. Grâce aux nouveaux eclairages qu'il apporte sur les principes fondamentaux de survie en foret, ainsi qu'au materiel inedit qu'il a developpe et experimente maintes fois en foret, monsieur Bourbeau nous permet de decouvrir les secrets de la nature. Indispensable pour tout amant du plein air ou travailleur de la foret, qui risque tot ou tard de se retrouver en situation de survie, Le Surviethon : vingt-cinq ans plus tard presente une serie de chapitres innovateurs, grâce a une langue simple, des illustrations claires et un humour mordant. Un veritable heritage, unique, mais surtout un outil de reference indispensable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.055 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".