MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2904182791 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky404.1084

14 Signatures of pre-natal nutrition in cattle: adaptations in DNA methylation, gene expression, and post-natal growth.

2018· article· en· W2904182791 on OpenAlexaff
Carolyn Fitzsimmons, J Devos, C Li, Francois Paradis, Christina Straathof, G.B. Penner, Kathryn E. Hare, James McKinnon, F. Añez-Osuna, H. C. Block, M.G. Colazo, Heather L. Bruce

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA methylationBiologyGeneMyogenesisAdipogenesisGenomic imprintingEpigeneticsMethylationAndrologyGene expressionGeneticsEndocrinologyPhysiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exploring pre-natal nutrition to modulate and improve post-natal growth and development in cattle continues to reveal new opportunities for researchers, and ultimately cattle producers. Effects of pre-natal dietary interventions have been shown to be markedly time- and treatment-specific, although a few particular patterns of changes in post-natal growth present themselves recurrently. Male calves, both bulls and steers, appear to be more susceptible to alterations in pre-natal maternal nutrition and, when the opportunity presents, turn it into increased growth performance at a later stage of life (Fitzsimmons unpublished, Añez-Osuna et al. 2018). Male calves may also develop differences in growth patterns in association with pre-natal nutrition even if no differences in weight are detected at birth. Elucidating the how and why behind these changes is more challenging, as well as any long-term effects upon animal health and longevity. Examination of gene expression patterns within tissues that are highly connected with growth and metabolism in cattle, for example skeletal muscles and liver, shows that expression of genes connected to overall growth such as the IGF family, myogenesis (MYOD1, MYOG, etc.), adipogenesis (PPARG), as well as microRNAs that modulate proliferation and differentiation in skeletal muscle, can be associated with pre-natal maternal diet (Paradis et al. 2017). Furthermore, DNA methylation patterns of differentially-methylated regions (DMRs) near the genes for IGF2 and IGF2R in the bovine have been found to be significantly associated with pre-natal maternal diet, and the degree of methylation of IGF2 DMR2 to be negatively correlated with IGF2 expression (Paradis et al. 2017, Fitzsimmons et al. 2017). Dissecting the causes and effects of these associations still presents a great challenge, but the possibility of explaining more of the ‘E’ in the classic equation of Phenotype = Genotype (G) + Environment (E) + G X E is a fascinating and exciting opportunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→