The Regression Analysis of the Kindergarten Teachers' Education Concept
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scientific and rational concept of education is of great significance to the development of kindergarten teachers. In order to investigate kindergarten teachers’ concept of education task, education content, young children’s one-day life, and young children’s active learning. The Kindergarten Teachers’ Education Concept Questionnaire was adopted in the research, and 138 kindergarten teachers who come from Sichuan province were sampled as the research objects. The results showed that educational attainment had an overall effect on kindergarten teachers’ education concept. Professional rank had an effect on kindergarten teachers’ concept of education task. Kindergarten teachers’ concept of education content had significant differences in different regions. Household income had an effect on kindergarten teachers’ concept of young children’s one-day life. Personal relations had an effect on kindergarten teachers’ concept of children’s active learning. That is to say, kindergarten teachers’ education concept was influenced by factors like educational attainment, professional rank, location of kindergarten, personal relations, household income etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it