MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904217146 · doi:10.1002/pamm.201800259

Thermodynamical consistency of an anisotropic meanfield damage model for SMC composites

2018· article· en· W2904217146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePAMM · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsComposite materialAnisotropyMaterials scienceConsistency (knowledge bases)Composite numberMolding (decorative)FiberSheet moulding compoundIsotropyMatrix (chemical analysis)MathematicsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This contribution investigates the thermodynamic consistency of a meanfield damage model published by the authors [1]. The model is based on an empirical description of the fiber orientation distribution function (FODF). Due to a combination of matrix damage and fiber‐matrix interface debonding, the model is able to predict the inhomogeneous and anisotropic evolution of the overall behavior of the considered Sheet Molding Compound (SMC) composite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it