A Programmable Multi-Biomarker Neural Sensor for Closed-Loop DBS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of the current closed-loop DBS devices use a single biomarker in their feedback loop which may limit their performance and applications. This paper presents design, fabrication, and validation of a programmable multi-biomarker neural sensor which can be integrated into closed-loop DBS devices. The device is capable of sensing a combination of low-frequency (7-45 Hz), and high-frequency (200-1000 Hz) neural signals. The signals can be amplified with a digitally programmable gain within the range 50-100 dB. The neural signals can be stored into a local memory for processing and validation. The sensing and storage functions are implemented via a combination of analog and digital circuits involving preamplifiers, filters, programmable post-amplifiers, microcontroller, digital potentiometer, and flash memory. The device is fabricated, and its performance is validated through: (i) bench tests using sinusoidal and pre-recorded neural signals, (ii) in-vitro tests using pre-recorded neural signals in saline solution, and (iii) in-vivo tests by recording neural signals from freely-moving laboratory mice. The animals were implanted with a PlasticsOne electrode, and recording was conducted after recovery from the electrode implantation surgery. The experimental results are presented and discussed confirming the successful operation of the device. The size and weight of the device enable tetherless back-mountable use in pre-clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".