MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904242730 · doi:10.5267/j.msl.2018.12.003

Simulation-based optimization approach for vehicle allocation in a private transport service: A case study

2018· article· en· W2904242730 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrés Muñoz‐Villamizar, Jairo R. Montoya‐Torres, Carlos A. Moreno-Camacho

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement Science Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidad de La Sabana
KeywordsService (business)Computer scienceOperations researchTransport engineeringBusinessOperations managementProcess managementMarketingMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poor urban planning and traffic congestion lead to excessive delays in workers' transit times and decrease their quality of life, especially in emerging countries.Several medium and large companies have a need to hire a transport service for their staff.In this type of transportation system, there is a heterogeneous fleet of vehicles, which are assigned to a set of pre-defined routes.However, the total transport delay can be even greater if the private transportation system is inefficient or not controlled.The approach proposed in this study seeks to optimize the private transport service by defining the best allocation of its fleet to its routes.A mathematical model is proposed to minimize user wait times.This approach is validated using real data obtained from a transport company in Colombia.The results demonstrate the quantitative benefits that can be achieved when the proposed approach is implemented, represented by a considerable reduction in user wait times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement Science LettersSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207